Monday, April 24, 2017

Orthodoxy by G.K. Chesterton The Notes and Outline of Chapter 1 of book study developed by Belinda Roccaforte 2014

Orthodoxy
By: G.K. Chesterton
Chapter 1 Review: Introduction in Defense of Everything

I.               Introduction in Defense of Everything
II.              The Maniac
III.            The Suicide of Thought
IV.            The Ethics of Elfland
V.              The Flag of the World
VI.            The Paradoxes of Christianity
VII.           The Eternal Revolution
VIII.         The Romance of Orthodoxy
IX.            Authority and the Adventurer

Chapter 1
Structure of the general argument suggested in Chapter 1 of Orthodoxy and brought to a completion in chapter 8:
(1) Human beings have a double spiritual need for adventure and security (or: balance between imagination and reason--or the exciting and the commonsensical).
(2) This need is not pathological, but is identical with a need for psychological health, i.e., sanity.
(3) This need is better satisfied by accepting the Christian worldview than by accepting any alternative worldview.
Therefore, it is at least reasonable to accept the Christian worldview.
(4) Furthermore, alternative worldviews fail to a greater or lesser extent to satisfy the aforementioned double spiritual need.
Therefore, it is unreasonable to prefer any such alternative to the Christian worldview.

It is crucial to note that until the last chapter, chapter 9, the argument of the book is aimed at showing that Christian belief and practice is healthy and not that it is true.  As Chesterton puts it in chap. 2:  "It must be understood that I am not now discussing the relation of these creeds to truth but, for the present, solely their relation to health.  Later in the argument I hope to attack the question of objective verity; here I speak only of a phenomenon of psychology."

My notes:
Week One Questions:
1.      What is the purpose of the book.  Why did Chesterton write it?
2.     What does Chesterton think about sin in his time period?
3.     How does he discuss sanity vs. insanity?

I.               Introduction in Defense of Everything

Purpose of Book:  We need to be happy in the world without being comfortable.  This achievement of his creed that he pursues by writing the book.  POINT OF BOOK: what keeps us sane is right first principles.   What is the “right end” is the point of the book.

Orthodoxy means “straight truth”
Paradox  means “the truth that goes against expectation”
For Chesterton orthodoxy is paradox

p. 19  This idea of believing in “oneself” is really nonsensical.  So what is it we are to believe?  Chesterton explains why we should not believe in oneself and what to believe in.  “Even evil people believe in themselves.”

What to believe in?  Both science and religion start with a basic fact.

Religions begins with the fact of sin.  This is being diluted and denied by both Christians and atheists.

The modern world describes sin as insanity.   When one relies only on logic and reason and refuses to engage imagination one is more likely to become “insane” which is the modern description for sin.

*part of insanity and a determinist is to see too much “cause” in everything. 
*sanity: signs of sanity is a sense of humor, charity, certainty of experience, affections

The ordinary man is a mystic (sane):
1)     Free to doubt his gods and free to believe in them
2)     Cares more for truth than consistency (he would take 2 truths that contradict and believe both making for a paradox not a matter for disbelief:  Example 1 God made man.  Example 2- fate and free will
3)     Contradiction – ability to accept contradictions is a sign of a healthy man.  (This appeals to me because of psychology practice and rigid inflexible being sign of unhappiness is observed in my practice).
4)     A mystic allows one mystery so everything else lucid

5)     The seat of dogma is mystery (ex. Trinity)

No comments:

Post a Comment